
“The widespread use of TDF/FTC can be justified only if its preventative benefits outweigh potential risks of safety issues. These new results, presented today, show that PrEP is safe to use,” the researcher said, while disclosing that they undertook a meta-analysis of 13 randomized trials with 15,678 participants. They says people at risk of HIV infection were given either TDF/FTC as PrEP or no treatment (the control, or placebo).
“There was no significant difference in risk of high grade or serious adverse events comparing PrEP with control. The risk of serious adverse events was almost the same for both groups. The results were 9.4% for those on PrEP and 10.1% for those on placebo. There was also no significant difference in risk of renal or bone adverse outcomes. The risk of bone fractures was 3.7% on PrEP versus 3.3% on no treatment. The risk of significant renal dysfunction was 0.1% on PrEP and 0.1% for no treatment,” they said.

“This is far too small a number to prevent 1.8 million new HIV infections. Clearly, to have a significant effect on the HIV epidemic, we need to scale up PrEP to reach tens of millions of people worldwide,” he says.
Researchers also announced that other PrEP modalities, such as long-acting injectable drugs and antibodies, are being tested in order to offer more choices of how PrEP could be taken.
Dr Andrew Hill of Liverpool University who is also one of the co-authors of the report, states that there is a new HIV infection every 18 seconds.
“The data is clear and it’s time to globally implement this recommendation,” he said.
The researchers claimed that the new results announced today are supported by another recent analysis, which showed no difference in adverse events between TDF/FTC and a combination of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) and FTC when taken for treatment with an additional antiviral drug.